Ohio Supreme Court, 1994

TRINOVA Corp. v. Pilkington Bros., P.L.C.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 16, 1994 · Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

71 Ohio St. 3d 1202; 640 N.E.2d 1144; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2582

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Hutchins v. Cardiac Science, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2006)
American Security & Audio Video Systems, Inc. v. Prep TMT, LLC (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2025)
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Columbus Downtown Dev. Corp. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2018)
Dvcc, Inc. v. Medical College of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (3-2-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
Corporex Development Constr. v. Shook, Unpublished Decision (3-23-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Defendants-appellants, Libbey-Owens-Ford Company and Pilkington Holdings, Inc., have filed with this court a motion to reconsider our September 14, 1994 decision (reported at 70 Ohio St.3d 271, 638 N.E.2d 572) in the above-captioned matter.

After consideration of appellants’ motion, we will treat it as a motion for clarification and grant same to the extent that the first sentence of the third full paragraph appearing at page 277, 638 N.E.2d at 576, should read as follows:

“We are likewise unpersuaded by the argument that LOF was a third-party beneficiary of the contract executed by TRINOVA and Pilkington.”

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. A.W. Sweeney and Wright, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.