DLZ Corp. v. Fisher
Ohio Supreme Court
DLZ Corp. v. Fisher, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1426 (Ohio 1994)
642 N.E.2d 634; 1994 Ohio LEXIS 3972
Pfeifer, Sweeney
DLZ Corp. v. Fisher
Opinion of the Court
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of the motion of respondent, James Conrad, to quash subpoena or alternatively to stay discovery of James Conrad, and the motion of respondent, Attorney General Lee Fisher, to stay discovery pending a decision on motion to dismiss,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions to stay discovery be, and are hereby, granted, effective December 12, 1994.
Reference
- Status
- Published