[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1209.]

WOOD COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. HANNA. [Cite as Wood Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hanna, 1995-Ohio-27.] Attorneys at law—Disciplinary action—Cause dismissed. (No. 95-822—Submitted September 27, 1995—Decided November 22, 1995.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 93-82. __________________ Spitler, Vogtsberger & Huffman and Diane R. Huffman; Mitchell, Stearns & Hammer and James A. Hammer, for relator Wood County Bar Association. James D. Caruso, for respondent Harold M. Hanna. __________________ {¶ 1} After reviewing carefully the record herein, the cause is dismissed. DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., CONCUR.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. RESNICK, J., not participating. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would impose a public reprimand as recommended by the panel and the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________