Phan v. Presrite Corp.
Phan v. Presrite Corp.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 430.]
PHAN, APPELLANT, v. PRESRITE CORPORATION ET AL.; LINEMASTER SWITCH CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Phan v. Presrite Corp., 1995-Ohio-51.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1071—Submitted May 23, 1995—Decided July 5, 1995.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 64821. __________________ Jeffries, Kube, Forest & Monteleone Co., L.P.A., Michael R. Kube and Richard A. Vadnal, for appellant.
Rhoa, Follen & Rawlin Co., L.P.A., Albert J. Rhoa and James H. Crawford, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
COOK, J., dissents. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.