Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 188.]
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. URS COMPANY, APPELLANT; DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co., 1995-Ohio-48.] Statutes of repose—R.C. 2305.131 is unconstitutional. (No. 94-2378—Submitted April 4, 1995—Decided May 17, 1995.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 64496. __________________
Hahn Loeser & Parks, Mark E. Staib and Royce R. Remington, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425. Only that portion of the court of appeals' opinion that finds the indemnification and contribution claims of URS Company to be time barred by R.C. 2305.131 is reversed. The portion of the appellate opinion addressing URS Company's fraud claims is affirmed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
WRIGHT, J., dissents. __________________
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.