Piphus v. Blum
Piphus v. Blum
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 1211.]
[THE STATE EX REL.] PIPHUS ET AL. v. BLUM, CHIEF, ET AL. [Cite as Piphus v. Blum, 1995-Ohio-186.] Motions to dismiss granted. (No. 94-1804—Submitted April 4, 1995—Decided May 10, 1995.) IN PROHIBITION. __________________ Lawson & McLean, Kenneth L. Lawson and James E. McLean, for relators. Manley, Burke, Fischer & Lipton, Co., L.P.A., Timothy M. Burke and Andrew S. Lipton, for respondents Donald Blum, Chief of Police, Mark Reiber, Brian Blum, Scott Whitsken and John Does I through III, Officers of the Lockland Police Force. Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip L. Zorn, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent Hamilton County Court of Appeals. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is before the court on respondents' motions to dismiss. The motions are granted and the cause is dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. WRIGHT, J., dissents and would grant the writ. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Motions to dismiss granted.