Ohio Supreme Court, 1995

State v. Henry

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 22, 1995 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

71 Ohio St. 3d 564; 645 N.E.2d 730; 1995 Ohio LEXIS 481

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Caruthers v. Caruthers, Unpublished Decision (1-25-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant in his application to the court of appeals essentially stated that appellate counsel did not argue his case the way appellant thought he should have, or the way appellant himself would have argued it. This is not the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its entry denying the application for reopening.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.