State v. Henry

Ohio Supreme Court February 22, 1995

State v. Henry, 71 Ohio St. 3d 564 (Ohio 1995)

645 N.E.2d 730; 1995 Ohio LEXIS 481

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant in his application to the court of appeals essentially stated that appellate counsel did not argue his case the way appellant thought he should have, or the way appellant himself would have argued it. This is not the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its entry denying the application for reopening.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Henry
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published