Ohio Supreme Court, 1995

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 29, 1995 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 628; 646 N.E.2d 819; 1995 Ohio LEXIS 715
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record in this case and agree that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(4), (5), and (6), 3 — 101(B), and 9 — 102(B)(1). However, we cannot concur in the recommendation to impose further disciplinary measures where previous sanctions have been ignored with relative impunity. Therefore, we order that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.