DLZ Corp. v. Fisher
DLZ Corp. v. Fisher
71 Ohio St. 3d 1482; 646 N.E.2d 177; 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3091
DLZ Corp. v. Fisher
Opinion of the Court
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court upon the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. On February 17, 1995, respondent, Ohio Attorney General, filed a reply memorandum relating to respondent’s motion to dismiss. There being no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice permitting the filing of reply memoranda,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective February 22, 1995, that respondent’s reply memorandum be, and is hereby, stricken.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.