Ohio Supreme Court, 1995

State v. Dick

State v. Dick
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 1995 · Accept, Certification, Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Review, Sweeney, Wright
71 Ohio St. 3d 1490; 646 N.E.2d 466; 1995 Ohio LEXIS 637

State v. Dick

Opinion of the Court

On review of order certifying a conflict. No rule of law upon which an alleged conflict exists has been set forth clearly in the order of the court of appeals certifying a conflict within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV and Whitelock v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 594, 613 N.E.2d 1032. This cause is remanded to the court of appeals pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(A) for that court to clarify the issue presented and to set forth clearly in its order of certification the rule of law upon which the alleged conflict exists.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would accept the certification order for review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.