Ohio Supreme Court, 1995

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kurtz

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 12, 1995 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

72 Ohio St. 3d 18; 647 N.E.2d 150

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Alsfelder (Ohio 2004)
Burns v. Daily (Ohio Ct. App. 1996)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kurtz (Ohio 1996)
Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Kurtz (Ohio 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the stipulations and agree that respondent committed the cited misconduct. However, we consider a stay of the six-month suspension period too lenient for respondent’s violations of DR 2-106(A), 9-102(A), and 9-102(B)(3) and (4). We, therefore, order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, with this *21suspension to be followed by a two-year monitored probation under the condition that he makes full restitution with interest at the judgment rate to the Tuballeses by the end of his probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.