Ohio Supreme Court, 1995

Williams v. O'Brien

Williams v. O'Brien
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 7, 1995 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
72 Ohio St. 3d 288; 649 N.E.2d 831
Williams v. O'Brien

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stinson v. England (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 451, 633 N.E.2d 532.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting. We should add the learned treatise exception to the hearsay rule in Ohio Evid.R. 803, so that it mirrors its federal counterpart, Fed.Evid.R. 803(18). I, accordingly, dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.