State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1523 (Ohio 1995)
649 N.E.2d 833
Pfeifer

State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for protective order and motion to quash subpoenas or, alternatively, motion for protective order limiting the scope of the examination at the depositions of Robert McAuley, Steven Koff, or any other representative of relator, to questions about the substance and circumstances of relator’s request and follow-up requests for the resumes at issue and the city’s refusal of those requests,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective May 19,1995, that the motion for protective order limiting the scope of the examination at the depositions of Robert McAuley, Steven Koff, or any other representative of relator, to questions about the substance and circumstances of relator’s request and follow-up requests for the resumes at issue and the city’s refusal of those requests be, and the same hereby is, granted.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Reference

Full Case Name
State ex rel. The Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland
Status
Published