Romp v. Haig
Romp v. Haig
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1219.]
ROMP ET AL., APPELLEES, v. HAIG, APPELLEE; BAUER COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Romp v. Haig, 1996-Ohio-330.]
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently allowed. (No. 95-2059—Submitted October 16, 1996—Decided December 11, 1996.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-940268. __________________ White, Getgey & Meyer Co., L.P.A., and David P. Kamp, for appellees Kenneth and Debbie Romp.
Cuni, O’Brien & Ferguson Co., L.P.A., Thomas L. Cuni and Amy B. Schott Ferguson, for appellee D. Thomas Haig.
Dinsmore & Shohl, Steven H. Schreiber and Sara Simrall Rorer, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.