State v. Moore
State v. Moore
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1203.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MOORE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Moore, 1996-Ohio-343.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1993—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC03-388. __________________ Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee. Daniel D. Connor Co., L.P.A., and Daniel D. Connor, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.