State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Moore, 1996 Ohio 343 (Ohio 1996)
77 Ohio St. 3d 1203

State v. Moore

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1203.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MOORE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Moore, 1996-Ohio-343.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1993—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC03-388. __________________ Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee. Daniel D. Connor Co., L.P.A., and Daniel D. Connor, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.