Columbus v. Copley
Columbus v. Copley
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1202.]
CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, v. COPLEY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Columbus v. Copley, 1996-Ohio-342.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1828—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APC06-756. __________________ Ronald J. O’Brien, City Attorney, David M. Buchman, City Prosecutor, and Brenda J. Keltner, Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellee.
Max Kravitz, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.