Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 7, 1996
1996 Ohio 402; 76 Ohio St. 3d 231
Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 231.]

NOTTINGHAM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Nottingham v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1996-Ohio-402.] Insurance—Motor vehicles—Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an underinsurance claim must be paid, when—Determining amount of underinsurance coverage to be paid. (No. 96-101—Submitted July 10, 1996—Decided August 7, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 1995CA00068. __________________ Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos, James R. Recupero and David L. Dingwell, for appellees.

Robert J. Drexler, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 220, 667 N.E.2d 353.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., CONCUR.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent.

STRATTON, J., not participating. __________________

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.