Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- State Ex Rel. Rose v. McGinty, 92578 (2-2-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Stewart v. State, 92515 (2-4-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Strauss v. Celebrezze, 92369 (1-27-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Leon v. Cuyahoga County Ct. of Common Pleas, 92826 (3-27-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Wanamaker v. Davis, 2005-Ca-151 (8-24-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1283.]
WILLIAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996-Ohio-278.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1501—Submitted November 7, 1995—Decided January 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APE12-1735. __________________ Scott E. Smith Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Smith, for appellants. Lane, Alton & Horst, Rick E. Marsh and William Scott Lavelle for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.