Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1283.]
WILLIAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996-Ohio-278.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1501—Submitted November 7, 1995—Decided January 31, 1996.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APE12-1735. __________________ Scott E. Smith Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Smith, for appellants.
Lane, Alton & Horst, Rick E. Marsh and William Scott Lavelle for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.