Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court
Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996 Ohio 278 (Ohio 1996)
74 Ohio St. 3d 1283

Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1283.]

WILLIAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996-Ohio-278.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1501—Submitted November 7, 1995—Decided January 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APE12-1735. __________________ Scott E. Smith Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Smith, for appellants. Lane, Alton & Horst, Rick E. Marsh and William Scott Lavelle for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Reference

Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.