State v. Said
State v. Said
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1282.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SAID, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Said, 1996-Ohio-261.] Motion for reconsideration dismissed as improvidently granted. (No. 93-1085—Submitted December 12, 1995—Decided January 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 92-L-018. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. __________________ Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael D. Murray, Ariana E. Tarighati and Julie E. Mitrovich, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. Paul H. Hentemann, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, Randy D. Ashburn and John B. Heasley, Assistant Public Defenders, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Office of Ohio Public Defender. __________________ {¶ 1} A motion for reconsideration was granted in this cause on February 15, 1995, in 71 Ohio St.3d 1467, 644 N.E.2d 1389, and oral arguments were again presented on December 12, 1995. {¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration requesting this court to reconsider its ruling in State v. Said (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 473, 644 N.E.2d 337, is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently granted. MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Motion for reconsideration dismissed as improvidently granted.