Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 10, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 204; 658 N.E.2d 250
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bonetti

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6). We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Respondent is therefore suspended for two years from the practice of law in Ohio; however, we suspend both years of the sanction period and place respondent on probation under the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.