Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bortz
Ohio Supreme Court
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bortz, 74 Ohio St. 3d 207 (Ohio 1996)
658 N.E.2d 252
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Bortz
Opinion of the Court
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violation of DR 5-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. Regrettably, I must respectfully dissent. I recognize the mitigating factors in this case; nevertheless, I believe this court should be
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cincinnati Bar Association v. Bortz
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published