Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 10, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 218; 658 N.E.2d 261

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), and 6-101(A)(3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), V(4)(G), and VI. We also agree with the sanction recom*221mended for this misconduct. Respondent is therefore permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑