Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

State v. Richardson

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 10, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

74 Ohio St. 3d 235; 658 N.E.2d 273

Cases that cite this one

32 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

State v. Slagle (Ohio 2002)
State v. Slagle (Ohio 2002)
State v. Dudas (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
State v. Parker (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
State v. Burks (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
Thomas v. Bracy (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2020)
State v. Cowan (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
State v. Pointer (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Townsend (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Davis (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Huber, Unpublished Decision (6-28-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Fuller, Unpublished Decision (5-8-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Towns, Unpublished Decision (4-22-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Stockwell, Unpublished Decision (3-26-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Cruz, Unpublished Decision (10-4-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Zayid, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Slagle, Unpublished Decision (5-29-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Perry, Unpublished Decision (9-19-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Stewart, Unpublished Decision (11-02-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State v. Sherrills, Unpublished Decision (3-6-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State v. Robinson, Unpublished Decision (11-5-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
Stapleton v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2023)
Martin v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
Christopher Smith v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Inst. (6th Cir. 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. We find no injustice in applying the doctrine of res judicata on these facts. Since the date of the appellate decision sought to be reopened, appellant has appealed directly to this court and filed one application for reopening. Neither App.R. 26(B) nor State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204, provides for second and subsequent applications for reopening. Therefore, the court of appeals did not err in finding that the matter of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is now res judicata.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.