Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

State v. Winstead

State v. Winstead
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 10, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 277; 658 N.E.2d 722
State v. Winstead

Cases that cite this one

105 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We agree that a courier’s delay in delivery is not “good cause” for accepting an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening that is untimely filed. Moreover, there is. no denial of due process or equal protection in applying to this appellant a rule applicable to all appellants.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.