State v. Winstead
State v. Winstead
74 Ohio St. 3d 277; 658 N.E.2d 722
Cases that cite this one
105 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Campbell (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Cutlip (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
- State v. Dodson (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
- Kenneth T. Richey v. Betty Mitchell, Warden (6th Cir. 2005)
- State v. Parker (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- State v. Haynik (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- State v. Guffie (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- State v. Wilson (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
- State v. Easterly (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
- State v. Goodykoontz (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
- State v. Dudas (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
- State v. Carano (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
- State v. Preston (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Dudas (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Tomlinson (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Burks (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
- State v. Diaz (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Thompson (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Futo (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State v. Black (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State v. McSwain (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Congress (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Johnson (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Mathis (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. Moore (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We agree that a courier’s delay in delivery is not “good cause” for accepting an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening that is untimely filed. Moreover, there is. no denial of due process or equal protection in applying to this appellant a rule applicable to all appellants.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.