Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

State v. Hawkins

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 14, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

74 Ohio St. 3d 530; 660 N.E.2d 454

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Clinkscale (Ohio 2009)
State v. Weger (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
State v. Demastry (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Krutowsky, Unpublished Decision (4-3-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Lawless, Unpublished Decision (7-12-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Walton, Unpublished Decision (10-19-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State v. Robb (Ohio 2000)
State v. Robb (Ohio 2000)
State v. Hawkins (Ohio 1996)
Gaskins v. Shiplevy (Ohio 1996)
Gaskins v. Shiplevy (Ohio 1996)
State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (8-25-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
State v. Hawkins (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the decision of the court of appeals for the reason stated in its entry. Further, we reject Hawkins’ unsupported assumption that fewer than three judges of the court of appeals decided to deny his application for reopening. The fact that only the presiding judge of the court of appeals signed the entry does not impeach the entry. App.R. 22(A) requires only “a journal entry signed by a judge of the court.” Hawkins has not contradicted the presumption of regularity accorded all judicial proceedings. State v. Sweet (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 375, 650 N.E.2d 450; Coleman v. McGettrick (1965), 2 Ohio St.2d 177, 180, 31 O.O.2d 326, 328,207 N.E.2d 552, 554.

Judgment affirmed.

*532Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.