Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Disbar, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 594; 660 N.E.2d 1147

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of misconduct and recommendation of the board. Respondent, Perry Lowell Brown, is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, with any petition for reinstatement conditioned upon complete restitution to the Eaton National Bank and Trust Co. and reimbursement to respondent’s grandparents for all monies borrowed to make restitution. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent and would disbar.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑