Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright

74 Ohio St. 3d 599; 660 N.E.2d 1150

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cheselka (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2019)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but that suspension is held in abeyance and respondent is placed on probation for two years upon the conditions recommended by the *601board. Restitution is to be made within ninety days from this order. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.