Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 599; 660 N.E.2d 1150

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but that suspension is held in abeyance and respondent is placed on probation for two years upon the conditions recommended by the *601board. Restitution is to be made within ninety days from this order. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑