Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Disbar, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

74 Ohio St. 3d 607; 660 N.E.2d 1156

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the board. We adopt its findings of fact and conclusions of law and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Furthermore, as a condition for reinstatement, respondent must make full restitution to his clients with interest according to the judgment rate. We tax costs to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents and would disbar.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.