Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Disbar, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 607; 660 N.E.2d 1156

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the board. We adopt its findings of fact and conclusions of law and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Furthermore, as a condition for reinstatement, respondent must make full restitution to his clients with interest according to the judgment rate. We tax costs to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents and would disbar.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑