Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

74 Ohio St. 3d 618; 660 N.E.2d 1164

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Kimble, Unpublished Decision (5-15-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 7-109(B) and 1-102(A)(5) and (6). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.