Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 618; 660 N.E.2d 1164

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 7-109(B) and 1-102(A)(5) and (6). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑