Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rust

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rust
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
74 Ohio St. 3d 635; 660 N.E.2d 1175

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Rust

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct, but we consider public reprimand a sufficient sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 5-105(A) and (B) and 9-102(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.