Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Beagle v. Walden

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 17, 1996 · Cook, Permit, Sweeney, Would

74 Ohio St. 3d 1499; 659 N.E.2d 315

Opinion of the Court

Certified State Law Question, No. 595CV1146. On preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. XVIII(6). The court will answer the following question:

“Is Ohio Revised Code § 3937.18(A)(2) unconstitutional on any grounds under the facts of this case, including those stated by plaintiff[?]” Sua sponte, this cause shall be set for oral argument.

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent and would not permit oral argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.