Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 13, 1996 · Because, Douglas, Hearing, Intervene, Invite, Pfeifer, Secretary, State, Stay, Sweeney, Would
74 Ohio St. 3d 1520; 660 N.E.2d 740; 1996 Ohio LEXIS 3796

State ex rel. Harbarger v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the respondent is prohibited from proceeding to conduct a hearing or engage in further proceeding related to the protests against the candidacies of relators, pending disposition of this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file their merit briefs on or before February 20,1996. No extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be permitted.

*1521Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur and would also invite the Secretary of State to intervene. Pfeifer, J., concurs in part because he would not stay the hearing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑