Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 10, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Twelfth, Wright, Young

75 Ohio St. 3d 397; 662 N.E.2d 351

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court agrees with the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Young, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.