Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac
75 Ohio St. 3d 1481; 664 N.E.2d 534
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac
Opinion of the Court
On May 6, 1996, respondent Paul Pagac III filed a motion requesting that this court amend its decision of June 28, 1995. Respondent’s motion is, in substance, a motion for reconsideration and, as such, is not timely under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI. Whereas S.CtPrae.R. XI prohibits the filing of untimely motions for reconsideration,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken, effective May 10,1996.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.