Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

State v. Otte

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1996 · Certain, Cook, Grant, Pfeifer, Reset, Stay, Stratton, Sweeney, Today

75 Ohio St. 3d 1484; 664 N.E.2d 537

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga County, No. 64617. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the timely filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, IT IS ORDERED that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the compliance with the mandate and the execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.

*1485F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., would grant the stay to a date certain. Pfeifer J., would grant the stay to a date certain, one hundred eighty days from today. Stratton, J., would grant but reset.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.