Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Snyder v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 7, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Proposition, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

76 Ohio St. 3d 230; 667 N.E.2d 359

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Snyder v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

As to Proposition of Law No. 1, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 220, 667 N.E.2d 353.

As to Proposition of Law No. 2, the appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent on Proposition of Law No. 1 and concur on Proposition of Law No. 2. Stratton, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.