Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Snyder v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Snyder v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 7, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Proposition, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
76 Ohio St. 3d 230; 667 N.E.2d 359

Snyder v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Opinion of the Court

As to Proposition of Law No. 1, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 220, 667 N.E.2d 353.

As to Proposition of Law No. 2, the appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent on Proposition of Law No. 1 and concur on Proposition of Law No. 2. Stratton, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑