Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

State v. Loomer

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 21, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

76 Ohio St. 3d 398; 667 N.E.2d 1209

Cases that cite this one

36 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

State v. Barner (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
State v. Stansell (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
State v. Congress (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
Westlake v. Gordon (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
State v. Rogers (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
State v. Pointer (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Pointer (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State v. Bronczyk (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Nicholson (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Townsend (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Rodriguez (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Waver (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Alford (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Harrison (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Bennett, 90815 (1-26-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (3-2-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (8-16-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
State v. Perotti, Unpublished Decision (5-4-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (5-27-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Young, Unpublished Decision (5-20-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Maxwell, Unpublished Decision (9-05-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State v. White, Unpublished Decision (9-28-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
State v. Blair, Unpublished Decision (8-15-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State v. Epps, Unpublished Decision (4-13-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
State v. Halliwell, Unpublished Decision (1-28-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. App.R. 26(B)(1) clearly provides that a “defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Emphasis added.) Since the judgment that Loomer complains about was an appeal from a motion to dismiss, and not an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence, no basis existed under App.R. 26(B) to reopen the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and'STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.