Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 28, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

76 Ohio St. 3d 481; 668 N.E.2d 478; 1996 Ohio LEXIS 619

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (Ohio 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (Ohio 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (Ohio 2001)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rogers (Ohio 1999)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Webster (Md. 1998)
Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Davis (Ohio 2012)
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Rogers (Ohio 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the suspension stayed on condition that respondent attend a minimum of six hours of Continuing Legal Education classes dealing with law office management in addition to his normal CLE obligation, and that he be on probation with the local bar association for a year or until the condition is met, whichever is longer. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Stratton, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.