Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 77 Ohio St. 3d 91 (Ohio 1996)
671 N.E.2d 232
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
Opinion of the Court
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The record indicates that respondent requires rehabilitation. This court’s duty to the public requires that respondent affirmatively demonstrate his rehabilitation before we allow him to resume his place on the rolls of those permitted to practice law in Ohio. We have thus far suspended respondent from the practice of law for an interim period. We now hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period. Costs taxed to the respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Reference
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published