Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 13, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

77 Ohio St. 3d 91; 671 N.E.2d 232

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hiltbrand (Ohio 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher (Ohio 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher (Ohio 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (Ohio 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The record indicates that respondent requires rehabilitation. This court’s duty to the public requires that respondent affirmatively demonstrate his rehabilitation before we allow him to resume his place on the rolls of those permitted to practice law in Ohio. We have thus far suspended respondent from the practice of law for an interim period. We now hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period. Costs taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.