Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 10, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

77 Ohio St. 3d 1206; 671 N.E.2d 260; 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1822

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Frenden (Ohio 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent John A. Frenden, a.k.a. John Anthony Frenden, Attorney Registration No. 0031512, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of February 28, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that John A. Frenden, a.k.a. John Anthony Frenden, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 601, 660 N.E.2d 1152.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.