Summit App. No. 17462. On October 1, 1996, appellant filed a document titled “Objection to entry, a demand not to dismiss, a demand to correct errors, and a demand that the Court accept jurisdiction.” Appellant’s document is, in substance, a motion for reconsideration that was untimely filed. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C) prohibits the filing of a motion for reconsideration that is not timely,

. IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the document be, and hereby is, stricken.