Ohio Supreme Court, 1996

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sorkin

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sorkin
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 18, 1996 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Suspension, Sweeney, Would
77 Ohio St. 3d 1425; 670 N.E.2d 1361; 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2052

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sorkin

Opinion of the Court

On August 5, 1996, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(1), relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a certified copy of the Report and Recommendation of the Healing Board of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, the Report and Recommendation of the Review Board of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, the Supreme Court of Illinois Order and Mandate entered on May 24, 1994, and the Supreme Court of Illinois Mandate entered on September 27, 1994, in which respondent, Samuel Maurice Sorkin of Deerfield, Illinois, Attorney Registration No. 0021027, was suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that this cause be, and is, hereby, dismissed as moot.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and Cook, JJ., dissent and would order a one-year suspension.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.