United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins., 77 Ohio St. 3d 1478 (Ohio 1996)
673 N.E.2d 140
Resnick, Sweeney

United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins.

Opinion of the Court

Washington App. Nos. 95CA27 and 95CA29. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue of the exclusion of liability coverage for the operation of a vehicle to deliver pizzas under the facts of this case when the vehicle is “being used to carry persons or property for a fee.” Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. Jermann (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 384, 657 N.E.2d 336, is the conflicting case.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins. Co.
Status
Published