Scott v. Spearman
Scott v. Spearman
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 1215.]
SCOTT ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. SPEARMAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Scott v. Spearman, 1997-Ohio-148.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-963—Submitted June 11, 1997—Decided July 30, 1997.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No. 95 CA 55. ___________________ Bricker & Eckler, Drew H. Campbell and Michael D. Smith, for appellants.
William C. Hayes and W. Scott Hayes, for appellee. ___________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. ___________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.