Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 1223.]

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOOHER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher, 1997-Ohio-65.] (No. 95-2554—Submitted and decided July 9, 1997.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. Michael Robert Booher, Attorney Registration No. 0007694, last known address in Middletown, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 29, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. Michael Robert Booher, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 509, 664 N.E.2d 522. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________