State v. Durr
State v. Durr
77 Ohio St. 3d 444; 674 N.E.2d 1379
State v. Durr
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening. Appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We further reject appellant’s propositions of law raised before this court for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.