Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

State v. Durr

State v. Durr
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 1997 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
77 Ohio St. 3d 444; 674 N.E.2d 1379

State v. Durr

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening. Appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We further reject appellant’s propositions of law raised before this court for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.