Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

State v. Durr

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 1997 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

77 Ohio St. 3d 444; 674 N.E.2d 1379

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Jones, Unpublished Decision (3-30-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Chesney, Unpublished Decision (3-29-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Durr (Ohio 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening. Appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We further reject appellant’s propositions of law raised before this court for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.