Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

State ex rel. Brantley v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 1997 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

77 Ohio St. 3d 446; 674 N.E.2d 1380

Cases that cite this one

20 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (Ohio 1997)
Jackson v. Cook, Warden (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
Boyd v. McGinty, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Palmer v. Rose, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Jackson v. Wilson (Ohio 2003)
Griffin v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-19-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
Palmer v. State, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
Travis v. Bagley (Ohio 2001)
Travis v. Bagley (Ohio 2001)
Jackson v. Haskins (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (Ohio 1997)
State v. Wilson, Unpublished Decision (5-23-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
Perotti v. Ishee, Unpublished Decision (10-29-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
Harrison v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Unpublished Decision (3-22-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State Ex Rel. Milgrim v. Munks, Unpublished Decision (11-24-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State Ex Rel. Sadovskiy v. McFaul, Unpublished Decision (9-29-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
Rushing v. Haskins, Unpublished Decision (1-26-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
Shivers v. Tate, Unpublished Decision (1-26-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State v. Mack, Unpublished Decision (8-3-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
State ex rel. Brantley v. Anderson (Ohio 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals correctly determined that an appeal rather than the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy when challenging claimed violations of an accused’s right to a speedy trial. State ex rel. Dotson v. Rogers (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 25, 607 N.E.2d 453; Russell v. Tate (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 444, 444-445, 596 N.E.2d 1039, 1040.

In addition, Brantley’s petition was subject to dismissal because he failed to attach a copy of his alleged commitment. R.C. 2725.04(D); Adkins v. McFaul (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 350, 353, 667 N.E.2d 1171, 1174.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.