Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

State v. Fautenberry

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 30, 1997 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

78 Ohio St. 3d 320; 677 N.E.2d 1194

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Fautenberry v. Mitchell (6th Cir. 2008)
Fautenberry v. Mitchell (6th Cir. 2008)
State v. Sizemore (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
State v. Fautenberry (Ohio 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgments of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening and motion for reconsideration for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals. Further, appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We reject all of appellant's propositions of law raised before this court.

Judgments affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.