State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Palmer v. Rose, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- Palmer v. State, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State Ex Rel. Jakim v. Ambrose, Unpublished Decision (1-9-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- Pesci v. Jones, 89437 (5-9-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- State ex rel. Jefferson v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority (Ohio 1999)
- State ex rel. Jefferson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Ohio 1999)
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. Suster (Ohio 1998)
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. Suster (Ohio 1998)
- State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano (Ohio 1997)
- Armstrong v. Altiere, Unpublished Decision (5-12-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- Elersic v. Wilson, Unpublished Decision (8-8-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- Novak v. State, Unpublished Decision (7-12-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
- State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano (Ohio 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Williams asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. Williams’s assertion lacks merit for the following reasons.
First, a claimed denial of the right to a speedy trial is not cognizable in habeas corpus. State ex rel. Dotson v. Rogers (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 25, 607 N.E.2d 453. Instead, appeal is the appropriate remedy to raise this claim. Russell v. Tate (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 444, 444-445, 596 N.E.2d 1039, 1040.
Second, the speedy trial issue has been previously adjudicated on direct appeal, and res judicata bars Williams from relitigating the issue in a habeas corpus action. Id., 64 Ohio St.3d at 445, 596 N.E.2d at 1040.
Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.