Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

State ex rel. Hamilton v. Fifth Dist. Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Hamilton v. Fifth Dist. Court of Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 28, 1997
78 Ohio St. 3d 1417; 676 N.E.2d 121; 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3828

State ex rel. Hamilton v. Fifth Dist. Court of Appeals

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. On February 26, 1997, relator filed a document titled “Motion for Declaratory Judgment for “Writ of Mandamus’.” It appears to the court that relator’s motion is, in substance, a request for reconsideration of this court’s entry of January 15, 1997, and, as such, is untimely *1418pursuant, to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(A). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C) prohibits the filing of an untimely motion for reconsideration,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑